tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9732296.post112582527762823657..comments2023-06-14T06:05:04.326-07:00Comments on Mr Subliminal's Blog: All-inMr Subliminalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03695144984530658902noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9732296.post-1125888436270225542005-09-04T19:47:00.000-07:002005-09-04T19:47:00.000-07:00You're absolutely correct about the 14 outs v. 15 ...You're absolutely correct about the 14 outs v. 15 outs issue. I realized my mistake just as soon as I got home that day, and I'm glad you reminded me to correct it.<BR/><BR/>As far as "favorite to lose", you and I are arguing the same point, and the confusion is over semantics. What I meant by "favorite to lose" was simply that there was a greater than 50% chance that I would lose. When discussing pure probability or statistics, my terminology wouldn't have been confusing--when discussing poker, the word "favorite" has a slightly dif. meaning. I am not, as you point out, the most likely of the four to lose--indeed I'm the least likely to lose. But I'm still more likely to lose than win... a point about which you and I are both in perfect agreement.<BR/><BR/>I'm going to edit my original post to correct the # of outs and reword the section on what I was thinking about the other players hands.<BR/><BR/>Glad you like reading my posts!Beckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11367987948230866609noreply@blogger.com